Composed - Alzubra

Yeah, I know what I'm doing. And I'm writing about it. Right. Write.

September 26, 2004

New Site Location

I'm officially opening my new web site. The archives aren't all there yet (are they ever?), and I still haven't moved my writing and personal sections over, but the new site has the past two weeks' worth of entries loaded and will have all the new entries available, too.

Alzubra.com should start pointing to the new site location shortly, depending on how long it takes for the name servers to update. But for now, use this link to visit the new Composed.

September 25, 2004

And Algorithms Choose Poor Style, Too

This article compares how Yahoo News and Google News operate. The main difference, of course, is that Yahoo uses humans to produce its page while Google uses algorithms. Google's methods result in some very strange quirks that go beyond the occasional wrong picture with the article (I believe when Ronald Reagan died, Google News served up a picture of him in "Bedtime for Bonzo" alongside the story on its page). However, since the article is from the Online Journalism Review, the site that employs journalists rather than those-cursed-machines-that-want-to-steal-our-jobs naturally wins out, so take some of it with a grain of salt. Still, Google may want to be a bit more selective in choosing the sources it deems "news."

OJR article: Balancing Act: How News Portals Serve Up Political Stories

September 24, 2004

Good Old Internet Addiction

The Australian: Survey finds 'web withdrawal' [September 24, 2004]: "Nearly half of US Internet users say they could not go without the Web for more than two weeks, with many suffering 'withdrawal' symptoms while offline, according to a recent survey."

Even today the suspicions surrounding the Internet as something "new" haven't died. I will say for myself that when our Internet at home died for several days, it didn't bother me. On the other hand, when I couldn't connect at school, I was intensely frustrated.

The difference, you see, is that while I was at home, I had lots of other people around to interact with and keep me engaged. At school, except when I was out with my parents those few days, I was by myself, unpacking. As I see it, it's really a social thing.

Hi-Larious

Yahoo! News - Britney's Tangled Wedding: A Primer: "For its part, People has defended the ceremony heavily documented in its pages as the 'real deal.'

'That is the next bump in the story that you're going to see: The wedding is fake. It's really not,' Jess Cagle, People senior editor, said Wednesday on CBS's Early Show.

Bitter rival Us begs to differ.

'Dan Rather was defending his George Bush (news - web sites) story a week ago. Where is Dan Rather today?' Baker asks. 'Granted, this is Britney Spears and not the President.'"

What's funnier: Britney's "spiritual" publicity stunt or just how seriously gossip "journalists" take their work?

September 23, 2004

Windows Warning

Code to exploit Windows graphics flaw now public | CNET News.com: "Code to exploit Windows graphics flaw now public

A sample program hit the Internet on Wednesday, showing by example how malicious coders could compromise Windows computers by using a flaw in the handling of a widespread graphics format by Microsoft's software.

Security professionals expect the release of the program to herald a new round of attacks by viruses and Trojan horses incorporating the code to circumvent security on Windows computers that have not been updated. The flaw, in the way Microsoft's software processes JPEG graphics, could allow a program to take control of a victim's computer when the user opens a JPEG file."

Also, note this:

"Microsoft: To secure IE, upgrade to XP

If you're one of about 200 million people using older versions of Windows and you want the latest security enhancements to Internet Explorer, get your credit card ready.

Microsoft this week reiterated that it would keep the new version of Microsoft's IE Web browser available only as part of the recently released Windows XP operating system, Service Pack 2. The upgrade to XP from any previous Windows versions is $99 when ordered from Microsoft. Starting from scratch, the operating system costs $199."

That means if you're using Internet Explorer on Windows 98 or Windows Me, no more browser updates for you. No more patches against the many exploits that can take control of your computer or just make pests of themselves through IE; no more updates to keep pace with the development of Web standards (i.e., pages are going to start looking funny to you after a while).

So if you don't have Windows XP or a Mac, now would be an especially good time to download the Mozilla Firefox browser.

September 22, 2004

Update Your Bookmarks

This is a very early warning. I'm planning to move my site here to another server in the not-too-distant future. Blogger's just too much of a pain these days. I don't have the new static address yet, but rest assured that this site's domain name will stay the same: http://www.alzubra.com. It's just that in a few weeks or so, using colleenfischer.blogspot.com instead won't get you to my musings. If you are already using alzubra.com to get here, don't worry about the impending change since it doesn't affect you. If you're not using alzubra.com to get here, consider switching to that now. It's never going to change on you.

Paranoia Is Justified

I hate the new Blogger interface still. It just ate my entry.

But here's the link. Until Tuesday, I'd never seen a pair of tongs like this in my life, but that day I saw them in the flesh and then again online a few hours later.

http://nytimes.com/2004/09/22/dining/22MOZZ.html?8hpib

My mind's working furiously on an explanation and approaching burnout.

September 21, 2004

A Small Voice

This is going to sound like heresy to some in the geek community, but I actually prefer the special editions of the Star Wars movies.

I think the CGI added in was done quite well (minus the weird Jabba the Hutt in the first film, but apparently that's been improved on DVD) and made the movies look subtly better.

Changing a good chunk of the end of "Return of the Jedi," including the ditiching the original music and adding views of other celebrations, didn't hurt certainly. It softens the "teddy-bear picnic" aura.

This may be most controversial, but I think it's better now that Greedo shoots first. Every time I saw the original, I could never figure out what happened in that scene. Why did Han shoot? Believe it or not, it doesn't fit with his character trajectory for him to be a cold-blooded murderer. Were he to turn out to be an agent of the Empire in disguise, then him simply murdering Greedo would have made sense as a foreshadowing device. But otherwise, it's just inconsistent with the rest of the film since Han's character is essentially good. Murder ain't cool, kiddies.

I understand the concerns of film preservationists who want to save the originals simply for the sake of history. But clinging to editions that just aren't quite as good otherwise smacks of stubbornness to me. True, I never saw the originals in the theater, only the special editions (hey, I was maybe a year old when the third one arrived), and so I don't have a sentimental attachment, but for pity's sake, it's a movie, and a blockbuster-style one at that. It's not like he's tampering with the Bible -- but then, that seems to upset people a lot less.

CNN.com - Five major changes in the 'Star Wars' DVD - Sep 20, 2004

September 20, 2004

A View From the Plex

I think today I will declare myself officially "moved in" here at the Foster-Walker Complex. I arrived on Saturday, true, but not until this Monday night did I finally finish unpacking, organizing and decorating. My room's looking pretty good, and I've even managed to plug everything in without seeking out a new power strip.

My room here is a lot more cheerful than either of my rooms in PARC (especially the first-floor one, which was perpetually dreary from the necessity of keeping my curtains closed all the time) and also my room last year. It's also a good bit bigger. I didn't think so when I first arrived, but now that I've gotten rid of all the boxes and reevaluated, this room seems to be about the size of a large PARC single. Appropriate for a senior such as myself, I think.

The Plex is stocked with much nicer bedroom furniture than what was given to us in PARC, too. The bedframe is even kind of cute and modern-looking. The desk, bookshelf and dresser have a faux-granite finish on their tops, which makes the place look more slick. The wardrobe/closet is rather handsome looking, too, when compared with the scuffed-up, dinky wardrobes we had in PARC. Plus, my room has its own air-conditioning unit with its own thermostat, so I control my room's temperature.

Everything in here's brighter, too, since the room comes with overhead lighting and a floor lamp. Add in my own extra-bright floor lamp and it's sunny all the time here. Definitely a welcome change. My room also features an exposed brick wall, which adds a good deal of character (and thankfully breaks up the clinical whiteness of the walls).

Not having a suite common room right outside my door made unpacking a bit more inconvenient. I've spent the past couple of days tripping over boxes and items not yet put away. Putting stuff in the hallway here isn't a great option since the halls are legendarily narrow. However, there's more quiet time without the common room there, which is nice when one wants to sleep or read.

The worst thing I've found so far here is the bathrooms. They have a horrible design. Four singles share each bathroom, and each bathroom has a toilet, two sinks and a shower. But I haven't mentioned the worst part. That is: There are no stalls. If someone needs to use the toilet or shower, they have to lock the bathroom door. That means no one else can use the other facilities at the same time. It's really inefficient, and I'm just hoping that there only being four of us will make it easier to deal with.

Another downside to Plex is the lack of kitchenettes on every floor. I hear there's a kitchenette in the basement, but I've yet to locate it. I'm hoping we'll hear more about where all the building's facilities are at tomorrow's floor meeting.

On the other hand, the laundry facilities here are vastly superior to PARC's. There's about 15 washers available (albeit, some seem to be broken) and a number of huge commercial dryers that actually work. When I did laundry on Sunday, there wasn't even a line. There's seats in the laundry room, so some people appear more inclined to wait downstairs for their laundry than PARCers ever were.

It's also nice having two dining halls and a convenience store just downstairs. It'd be nicer if they had smaller tables and more food variety like Allison Hall, but you take what you can get. Besides, with all the grab-and-go food and organic frozen dinners available in the C-store down there, I don't ever have to actually eat in the dining hall if I don't want to.

And hey, it's very nice to have both mailboxes and a mailroom in the building.

When I feel more up to it, I'll take some pictures with my web cam of the new room. Then you can feel outraged on PARC's behalf -- though I imagine we never got such nice stuff because of our propensity for breaking the walls.

September 16, 2004

Firefox Test Drive

Firefox 0.10 (that's "point ten," believe it or not) is quite nice. I just tested it out, and it has a lovely new bookmark bar gradient. It gives me high hopes for what they might accomplish in the final Mac release (which will come after the final Windows release because after they finish the guts of the browser, they're planning to work on Mac-version cosmetic issues). Also, the Live Bookmarks are nifty. If you've never investigated RSS, Atom or site feeds (there's a link to mine on the sidebar), Live Bookmarks are a way Firefox puts this headline service to use. Basically, if you were to create a "live bookmark" to my site in Firefox, it would look like a folder, and if you looked inside the folder menu, you'd see links to all my latest diary entries. You could see if I'd updated without having to actually visit my page. It works for a lot of sites. Pretty neat, no?

It Does Have To Be Pointed Out

Why is the new HereAndNow so very ugly? I didn't think it could necessarily get worse, but indeed it has. When they were talking redesign, I figured we'd be getting something new, not an uglier "refinement" of what was already there.

I'm not knocking the quality of any behind-the-scenes, non-design coding may be in place now to make the site function, but really, I think even I could have done better with the layout.

HereAndNow - Northwestern University Student Home Page

September 15, 2004

Trying a New Program

I'm giving a program called MacJournal a try right now. It's supposed to be able to update Blogger web sites now, so we'll see what happens when I hit post.

On another note, I discovered when checking my site stats today that more than half of the people visiting this site use a Mozilla-based browser. While the stat sites seem to be bunching Safari in with either the Mozilla or IE stats, it's still quite impressive.

New Firefox

Firefox 1.0 Preview Release was released yesterday (another birthday present, I suppose!). It's not the final version of the browser's first release (which makes me wonder why they're trying to promote downloads so much now), but check it out if you want to see what's coming in 1.0. It's certainly the best Firefox release yet, and if you're using Mozilla or Netscape, you might want to check it out now. It's a good bit easier to use.

September 14, 2004

A Weak Debate

This is unusually interesting.

Pat Buchanan is on "The Daily Show" right now, and he and Jon Stewart are debating who should bear more responsibility for the war in Iraq, which, unexpectedly enough, Buchanan opposes. (In fact, he was on the show shilling for a book he's written explaining why he feels this war is, to quote him tonight, possibly "the worst blunder of the past 40 years.")

Buchanan, naturally, followed up his initial condemnation of the war by saying we should be asking ourselves "why John Kerry voted for it." He went so far as to actually commend Ted Kennedy for having the guts to stand up and speak against the resolution authorizing the president to begin the attack. Stewart's response added up to "why blame the people on the bus more than the bus driver?" -- why single out one person of 100 to blame for the war?

But what's interesting about the whole conversation is how obvious are their struggles to find ways to defend their candidates. Stewart rightly asked Buchanan who he'd be voting for, and while Buchanan pointed out he didn't live in a swing state and thus the decision was already made, he gave the impression he'd be voting for Bush. He tried then to speak up for the president, blaming the Iraq war decision on the "neo-conservatives" within the administration who advised the president to go to war. The president, he said, at least "believed in" what he was doing.

But the question remains -- is the president the strong leader Buchanan says he is if he can be pushed around by his advisers this way? Buchanan's clearly in a bind -- he can't say he believes the president made this blunder, but it sounds just about as bad to say the president can't stand up for what Buchanan wants to believe he believes in. But with the alternative candidate being even farther away from his views, he clearly has to convince himself he wants four more years, albeit with these nefarious advisers "fired" (fat chance).

Stewart has the same sort of problems defending Kerry. Kerry didn't speak up against the war until the tide of public opinion started to turn against it. Buchanan makes the point that Kerry apparently said he would still have voted for the resolution, even knowing all we know today about the reasons for war being crap. Stewart tried to posit that the Senate didn't know Bush would use the authorization to go to war necessarily -- but even he said he figured the game was up as soon as the resolution passed. Essentially, Stewart can't find any reason for Kerry having voted as he did, at least not a reason that would sound any good and give reason to support Kerry. And saying we shouldn't blame Kerry for voting for war when he was only one of many is a crummy excuse, no matter how true it is he's not the sole reason it passed. And if it's true that Kerry still stands by his vote (I'm not sure I heard that right), it makes it awfully hard to build a case for the man regretting his actions and having grown wiser from experience.

The whole exchange illustrates well how dissatisfactory both candidates are in this election. The media goes on and on about how polarized the electorate is, but it seems the polarizing factor is not how much each side likes its own candidate but how much it hates the opposition's. It goes to show what a squirmy position every person who has some beliefs outside the center has been placed in.

I noticed it while I was at the Register, too, since it's a libertarian paper. The far right and the far left have a middle ground this time around, it seems, on at least this particular issue of Iraq. They oppose it for different reasons, I'm sure, but nonetheless, they both oppose it. But in digging in their heels against the same issue, they've ended up choosing different sides. It's something to think about.

As an aside, here's what Buchanan had to say about not running for president again: "The people have spoken to Pat Buchanan's political career," he said, laughing.

Fighting with Flying Bullets

"It's hard to pick the best thing to happen in the war on terrorism, but this is certainly up there. ... It's a yellow-alert world out there, and we need yellow-alert weapons. ... Look at Iraq -- the population there all have assault weapons, and they've been successful in holding off a much larger occupying force. I think there's something we could all learn from this model!"

-- Stephen Colbert (quoted loosely -- it is TV, after all), explaining the benefits of the ban on assault weapons expiring, on "The Daily Show."

Two and two

Two books, two shoes, two new movies, two sides to a jacket.

Two cakes, two times two candles.

Must be something going on around here.

September 11, 2004

And That Would Be Today, By the Way

Patriot Day - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: "Some greeting card companies have released Patriot Day cards, causing controversy among some. However, many companies such as Hallmark do not offer cards specifically for Patriot Day."

Scary

The New York Times > National > Old Fans Still Bubble Along to Lawrence Welk: "Like many of the assembled, she remembered watching the show with her parents or grandparents, and was now trying to indoctrinate her grandchildren. This was her first Welknotes gathering, but she felt she knew everyone already.

' 'Lawrence Welk' is the only good show that's ever been on,' she said, with a certainty that was characteristic of the group. 'We're trying to tell all the little kids how important this is. There's not another clean show. All I watch is the news, which isn't good now.'"

Apparently, this is also what draws the elderly folks online. Sorry, grandkids.

September 09, 2004

It's Rarely Good to Be Proved a Psychic

From today's MacHome HotTips newsletter:

AIRPORT CARD QUANDARY REVISITED
Q: How can I go wireless with my iBook? Apple no longer sells the standard AirPort Card--just AirPort Extreme--so what do I do? What all do I need and about what should I expect to pay? My school is wireless and if I can add wireless capability, it would be a big help. -- Marcia Boone

A: You're right -- Apple is no longer selling the original AirPort Card. This has left thousands of would-be-wireless users out in the cold. There are some USB-based alternatives such as D-Link's Wireless USB Adapter ($45; http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=175/ ) that will do the job. Still, the AirPort Card remains the single best way to go wireless with an iBook. Unfortunately, the only sure source for the standard AirPort Card is eBay, where they're now going for about $100-$125. This is a heavy premium to pay for the card--it had been selling for $79 before its discontinuation--but you may find that you have little choice in the matter.


I've been expecting this ever since Apple first introduced the AirPort Card. Apple has a reputation for creating proprietary cards and connectors that fit its design philosophy but leave users out in the cold when that philosophy changes. AirPort was exactly that: It was not a PC Card, like most other wireless cards for notebooks, and so it was only available from Apple. The slot, the only card expansion slot in iBooks, can't be used for anything else.

Computers equipped with regular AirPort (802.11b) slots were still being sold by Apple not all that long ago. Only a year ago, I know you could such Macs new. Where does this leave all the people who bought those computers figuring they might upgrade to a wireless card withing the three to five years they expected to use the computer? For some, their computers' warranties haven't even expired, and the machine is already more than obsolete.

Of course, Apple isn't offering computers so behind the times now. All its computers are capable of faster wireless, peripheral and computing speeds than those older iBooks. But that's not necessarily better, since its current wireless connectivity solution is yet another proprietary card, and the kicker is that it's a different size than the original AirPort cards, which means they don't fit in the slots built into slightly older Macs. Now, if you had a PC notebook or even a PowerBook and Netgear or some other company discontinued the 11-mbps wireless card you were planning to buy, you could buy Netgear's 56-mbps card instead without a problem (except maybe for the bigger hit to your wallet). It would still work.

I'm more embittered I guess because I've seen it happen many times. Of course, I already have a wireless card in my iBook, so I'm safe (assuming it doesn't stop working, especially since the warranty's expiring). But in our first Mac, a Performa desktop, we had a "communications" slot, which was the only internal expansion slot available. You needed a special Apple communications card to use it, which I believe was just an internal modem. However, by the time I discovered this slot, you couldn't buy cards for it anymore (except used ones). And we had an external modem anyway. But what if Apple had just given us a standard expansion-card slot rather than this wacky one? I'm sure we could have found something to put in that would have extended the life or usefulness of that computer. Much like giving iBook users a PC Card slot would have been more advantageous than giving them a proprietary slot and then discontinuing the only thing they can put in it.

If Apple's going to continue to offer proprietary wireless solutions, they ought to do the right thing and install the hardware into every notebook it sells. Even Intel doesn't require you to buy a separate card to take advantage of antennas built into Centrino notebooks.

September 07, 2004

Enough Said

Andy Ihnatko's YellowText: "During my adult life I've spend more than one afternoon standing in front of a school assembly talking about being a per-fesshional writer, and the message is always the same: the one skill you'll acquire in school that's absolutely, unquestionably worth honing are your writing skills. There is no career in which you won't have a big leg up if you're the best communicator in the room. The average person just plain can't write worth a damn, I tell them, and if they don't believe me, they should just wait until they get into college and are forced to write a paper as part of a group."